ISSN 1305-3825 | E-ISSN 1305-3612
Interventional Radiology - Original Article
Does the type and size of Amplatzer vascular plug affect the occlusion time of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations?
1 Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA  
2 Department of Radiology, Cairo University School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt  
Diagn Interv Radiol 2017; 23: 61-65
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2016.16120
This article was viewed 0 times, downloaded 13 times

Abstract

PURPOSE: Occlusion time (OT) is an important factor in the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) since it can lead to serious complications. The purpose of our study is to calculate the OT of Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP, St Jude Medical), and correlate it to the type of the device used (AVP or AVP 2) and the percent of device oversizing. Technical success rates and complications were also recorded.

 

METHODS: We retrospectively studied a total of 19 patients with 47 PAVMs who received percutaneous transcatheter embolization therapy using either AVP or AVP 2. We recorded the location, type, feeding artery diameter, AVP device used, and OT of each PAVM. We correlated the percent of device oversizing and the type of AVP with the OT. We also studied the rate of persistence of PAVM for both devices.

 

RESULTS: Forty-six (98%) of the PAVMs were simple. Device diameters ranged from 4.0–16.0 mm with device oversizing ranging between 14% and 120%. There was a statistically significant difference in the OT of AVP and AVP 2 (3 min 54 s vs. 5 min 30 s, P = 0.030). There was a weak positive correlation between OT and device oversizing for AVP (r=0.246, P = 0.324) and AVP 2 (r=0.261, P = 0.240). No major complications were identified. Immediate technical success rate was 100%

 

CONCLUSION: The use of AVP 2, and increase in device oversizing were not associated with reduction in the OT of PAVMs. There was no reported difference in safety between the two devices, and no major complications were noted.

Key Words
Authors
All
Author's Corner
Reviewer's Corner
Survey
Copyright © Turkish Society of Radiology | Latest Update: 30.12.2016