|
| Subcutaneous hydatid cyst in the popliteal fossa at the site of a previous wasp sting |
| Istvan Battyany1, Levai Andrea1, Karoly Kalmar Nagy2 |
1From the Departments of Radiology, Medical University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary 2From the Departments of Surgery, Medical University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary |
| Keywords: • hydatid cyst • insect sting • ultrasonography |
| DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2933-09.1 |
|
|
|
We report an uncommon case of a primary Echinococcus cyst
that developed in the subcutaneous tissue of the right popliteal
fossa, at the spot of a previous wasp sting, suggesting the possibility
of an unusual transmission of the eggs by insects. This
unusual presentation was initially considered as a Baker cyst
until parasytological results verified Echinococcus hydatidosus,
the larval form of Echinococcus granulosus, as diagnosis. However,
the most common path of Echinococcus granulosus infection
is through contact with a definitive host or by ingestion
of ova through contaminated water or food. Transmission by
insects should also be reconsidered in endemic areas. |
TopSummaryIntroductionCase PresentationDiscussionReferences |
|
|
Cystic hydatid disease is commonly caused by the larval stage of a
parasite, Echinococcus granulosus. It still constitutes a serious public
health problem in endemic regions. While liver and lung are the
most commonly affected areas in adults, hydatid cysts may develop in
almost any part of body[ 1]. Cystic hydatid disease can occur in all viscera
and soft tissues and has a high level of recurrence accounting for about
10%[ 2]. Soft tissue hydatid cysts occur in 2.3% of cases reported from
endemic areas; they are usually associated with involvement of other
structures[ 3]. Isolated involvement of soft tissues is relatively rare.
The development of primary Echinococcus cysts in humans is known
to result from oral ingestion of E. granulosus eggs, released from the intestinal
tract of carnivores. Humans are accidental intermediate hosts of
this organism[3]. Transmission by insects has not yet been published.
We report an unusual case of a primary hydatid cyst in the subcutaneous
tissue of the popliteal region which developed after a wasp sting. |
TopSummaryIntroductionCase PresentationDiscussionReferences |
|
|
A 63-year-old agriculture worker presented to our hospital with a mass
located in the lower part of the popliteal region of the right lower limb.
The patient reported that the swelling developed instantly at the spot
where he was stung by a bee or wasp. At first it appeared as a small coffee
bean shaped mass of 1–1.5 cm diameter and subsequently started
to grow slowly, reaching 3–4 cm of size in a couple of days. He had
no history of fever, weight loss, complaints of pain or claudication. On
physical examination the non-tender, slightly mobile mass with a sharp
contour was located in the lower and lateral aspect of the popliteal fossa.
The skin above the swelling was somewhat hyperemic but not warm
(Fig. 1). Posteroanterior chest radiograph and abdominal ultrasound revealed
no abnormalities except for multiple small anechoic well-defined
cysts in the bilateral renal sinuses. Laboratory investigation including
liver function tests were unremarkable.
 Click to Enlarge |
Figure 1: Well-shaped and well-demarcated mass located
in the lower and lateral aspect of the popliteal fossa. |
On ultrasonography of the mass located at the right popliteal region, a
well-defined oval cystic lesion (40×17×18 mm) was visible in the subcutaneous
tissue, with a double wall and multiple sized adjacent cyst-compartments
with internal echoes of viscous content and solid particles
(Fig. 2). Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the cysts was performed
without complications, and 7 mL of fluid was aspirated and sent
for cytological and parasitological examination. Cytological findings of
the sample only revealed leukocytes among fragmented red blood cells,
with activated and occasionally multinucleated macrophages and mast
cells. The sonographic pattern of the cyst suggested the diagnosis of hydatid
disease; according to the classification by Lewall and McCorkell,
the cystic lesion represented Echinococcus cyst Type II[1]. Since the
cysts filled back up, surgical excision of the lesion was indicated, with preoperative and postoperative administration
of mebendazol.
 Click to Enlarge |
Figure 2: Ultrasonography revealed a multiloculated subcutaneous cystic lesion
with internal echoes. |
On control examination ten months
after the excision, ultrasonography revealed
two novel serous cysts (15 mm
and 7 mm in diameter) in the subcutaneous
tissue at the scar of previous
surgery. Another FNAC was carried out
followed by application of compression
bandage. Despite multiple aspirations
the cystic lesions gradually grew into
the subcutaneous tissues and reached
the original size in almost two years
following the first excision. On ultrasonography
the penetration into deep
soft tissues of the hydatid cyst measuring
42×17×67 mm was observed.
Definition of the exact extent of the
cystic mass was made possible with
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Curative cystectomy was subsequently
indicated and performed for the second
time (Fig. 3). Histological and immunohistochemical
results showed cytokeratine
positive and CEA negative
polygonal epithelial cell proliferation
with cystic compartments in the dermis.
EMA reaction confirmed luminary membrane positivity. Malignant cells
were not found in the specimen. Parasitological
results verified Echinococcus
hydatidosus, the larval form of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitostatic medication
was administered; a three-month
course of mebendazole therapy was
completed.
Nevertheless, after the second surgery
further two consecutive cystectomies
were needed within a three-year period
due to recurring cysts. On the last operation
the excision of an approximately
1-cm firm cyst was performed. By gross
pathological examination the wall of
the cyst was focally thickened, white
and capsular, having inner trabeculae
with fluid content. The macroscopic
pattern of the excised mass suggested
hydatid cyst as a diagnosis, the parasitological
examination verified Echinococcus
hydatidosus as well. |
TopSummaryIntroductionCase PresentationDiscussionReferences |
|
|
Hydatid disease, caused by the larval
form of Echinococcus granulosus, is
endemic in cattle- and sheep-raising
regions, such as Central Europe, the
Mediterranean, the Middle East, South
America, Australia, New Zealand, and
South Africa[ 2]. The adult worms live
in the proximal small bowel of carnivores
as the definitive host, attached
by hooklets to the mucosa, and their
eggs are excreted in the feces. Humans
may become intermediate hosts
through contact with a definitive host
or by ingestion of ova through contaminated
water or food. In our case,
primary Echinococcus cyst developed
in the soft tissue in the lower part of
the popliteal region of the right lower
limb, at the spot of a previous wasp
sting, suggesting the possibility of an
unusual transmission of the eggs by insects.
Theoretically, wasps or other insects
may inoculate Echinococcus eggs
by getting in contact with contaminated
feces, and spread them by stinging
or biting the intermediate host. Lactic
acid produced by the underlying muscles
may assist in hatching of the ova,
allowing the parasite embryos to form
hydatid cysts.
Hydatid cystic disease of the soft tissues
is uncommon, accounting for only
2.3%, according to the largest published
series that consists of 24 cases in 1056
patients[4]. Despite its rarity, soft tissue
Echinococcus cyst might constitute an
important differential diagnosis of any
cystic mass in any anatomical location
in endemic areas. Clinically, a hydatid
cyst in the soft tissues might mimic teratomas,
abscesses, or fibromatosis. Subcutaneous
Echinococcus cysts are usually
less than 5 cm[5]; in the presented
case, due to its penetration to deeper
layers, the hydatid cyst reached 6.7 cm
axial diameter.
As in the case reported here, imaging
modalities and serologic investigations
can reveal the correct diagnosis, especially
in the presence of a competent
pathologic examination. Ultrasound
is an important imaging modality for
hydatid disease and may clearly demonstrate
the floating membranes and
daughter cysts characteristically seen in
purely cystic lesions[1]. Preoperative diagnosis
of subcutaneous hydatid disease
is also possible by FNAC; the presence of
diagnostic hooklets or laminated membrane
ensures correct identification.
No urticaria or anaphylactic reactions
have been reported as a complication
of this procedure[6], which encourages
broader adoption of this method. In
uncertain cases, MRI may be performed
to confirm the hypothesis and visualize
the lesion in various planes. The
diagnosis is frequently delayed until
the time of surgery, where observation
of the laminated membrane possibly
facilitates the identification. Postoperative
positive indirect hemagglutination
serology for Echinococcus granulosus can
also confirm the missing diagnosis;
however, sensitivity and specificity of
serologic tests are unknown.
In a recent study by Akhan et al. percutaneous
treatment was carried out
by either a ‘‘catheterization technique
with hypertonic saline and alcohol''
or a‘‘modified catheterization technique'',
according to the type of the
cyst, and an average of 96.1% volume
reduction was obtained in six cysts of
four patients[7]. Cavity infection and
cellulitis were observed as complications,
which resolved after medical
therapy[7]. Percutaneous treatment
is a safe and effective procedure in patients
with soft tissue hydatid cysts and
should be considered as a serious alternative
to surgery[7]. |
TopSummaryIntroductionCase PresentationDiscussionReferences |
|
|
1) Turgut AT, Akhan O, Bhatt S, Dogra VS.
Sonographic spectrum of hydatid disease.
Ultrasound Q 2008; 24:17–29.
2) Lewall DB, McCorkell SJ. Hepatic echinococcal
cysts: sonographic appearance and
classification. Radiology 1985; 155:773–
775.
3) Abu-Eshy SA. Some rare presentations of
hydatid cyst (Echinococcosis granulosus).
J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998; 43:347–352.
4) Epstein NA. Hydatid cyst of the breast: diagnosis
using cytological techniques. Acta
Cytol 1969; 13:420–421.
5) Muñoz Sánchez JA, Conthe Gutiérrez P,
Arnalich Fernández F, et al. Hidatidosis
en un hospital general. I. Análisis epidemiológico
de 1056 casos. Med Clin (Barc)
1982; 78:421–26.
6) Chevalier X, Rhamouni A, Bretagne S,
Martigny J, Larget-Piet B. Hydatid cyst of
the subcutaneous tissue without other
involvement: MR imaging features. Am J
Roentgenol AJR 1994; 163:645–646.
7) Akhan O, Gumus B, Akinci D,
Karcaaltincaba M, Ozmen M. Diagnosis
and percutaneous treatment of soft-tissue
hydatid cysts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
2007; 30:419–425. |
TopSummaryIntroductionCase PresentationDiscussionReferences |
|
|