PURPOSE

To propose a novel, inclusive classification that facilitates the selection of the appropriate donor and surgical technique in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

The magnetic resonance cholangiography examinations of 201 healthy liver donors were retrospectively evaluated. The study group was classified according to the proposed classification. The findings were compared with the surgical technique used in 93 patients who underwent transplantation. The Couinaud, Huang, Karakas, Choi, and Ohkubo classifications were also applied to all cases.

RESULTS

There were 118 right-lobe donors (58.7%) and 83 left-lateral-segment donors (41.3%). Fifty-six (28.8%) of the cases were classified as type 1, 136 (67.7%) as type 2, and 7 (3.5%) as type 3 in the proposed classification; all cases could be classified. The number of individuals able to become liver donors was 93. A total of 36 cases were type 1, 56 were type 2, and 1 was type 3. Of the type 1 donors, 83% required single anastomosis during transplantation, whereas six patients classified as type 1 required two anastomoses, all of which were caused by technical challenges during resection. Moreover, 51.8% of the cases classified as type 2 required additional anastomosis during transplantation. The type 3 patient required three anastomoses. The type 1 and type 2 donors required a different number of anastomoses (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed classification in this study includes all anatomical variations. This inclusive classification accurately predicts the surgical technique for LDLT.

Keywords: Bile duct variations, intrahepatic bile ducts, liver transplantation, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance cholangiography